Consensus quality statements on implementing an inhaler regimen switch in respiratory diseases

01 Apr 2024
Aim: To develop global expert consensus quality statements defining when inhaler regimen switching is appropriate, who should be involved, and key activities for implementation. Context: Clinicians and other decision-makers face situations (clinical and non-clinical, e.g. cost, environmental targets) that could prompt inhaler regimen switching, which can have unintended consequences. Description of change and justification: This consensus convened respiratory disease experts in primary care (general practitioner, pharmacist), secondary care (pulmonologists, nurses), health economics, and patient experts. Using a nominal group technique, experts generated consensus statements in response to questions on inhaler regimen switching. Who should be involved in decision-making and implementation? In what circumstances are inhaler switches appropriate/non-appropriate? What essential activities and timings are required to implement a successful switch? Responses were rated 1–7 (not at all important–extremely important). Strategy for change: This consensus states that inhaler regimen switches should be initiated and implemented by healthcare professionals experienced in inhaler prescribing. Highly rated circumstances for appropriate inhaler switching were inhaler technique errors and inadequate disease control due to symptoms/exacerbations (mean 6.25, 6.13, 6.13). No patient consultation, no training/education, no consent, patient prefers not to switch, and clinical stability were highly rated circumstances for non-appropriate switching (mean 7.0, 6.9, 6.6, 6.5, 6.5). Figure 1 presents a checklist of essential activities to implement a successful inhaler switch, requiring an estimated median of 35 minutes of clinical time per patient. Impact of change: This consensus provides clinicians and other decision-makers with practical guidance on who should initiate inhaler regimen switches and how they should be implemented to ensure they are effective, safe and sustainable. Lessons learned: Inhaler regimen switches must be expert-led and justified to patients. When setting healthcare policies, decision-makers should account for the clinical time and capacity required for successful inhaler switching, and the complexity of implementation at scale.

Resource information

Respiratory conditions
  • Other
Respiratory topics
  • Inhalers
Type of resource
Abstract
Conference
Athens 2024
Author(s)
Omar S Usmani1, Nicolas Roche2, J.F.M van Boven3, Jane Scullion4, José Miguel Padilha5, Tonya Winders6, Andreja Šajnić7, John P Bell8, Anna Lawson9, Alison Evans9, Ms Heather Wellam10, Adam BenTaieb10, Noah Froud11, Janwillem Kocks12,13,14,15 1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom, 2Hôpital Cochin, Service de Pneumologie, Paris, France, 3Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 4University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom, 5Nursing School of Porto, CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal, 6Global Allergy and Airways Patient Platform (GAAPP), Vienna, Austria, 7University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 8AstraZeneca, Baar, Switzerland, 9AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 10Mtech Access, Bicester, United Kingdom, 11MHP Group, London, United Kingdom, 12General Practitioners Research Institute (GPRI), Groningen, The Netherlands, 13Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore, 14Groningen Research Institute Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands, 15Dept of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands