Is Asthma Clinical Remission Achievable by Inhaled Therapy? A Post-Hoc Analysis of Single Inhaler Triple Therapy with FF/UMEC/VI in the CAPTAIN Trial

27 Mar 2025
Introduction: The composite endpoint of clinical remission (CR) is a treatment goal for patients with asthma. It is currently unknown if CR is achievable in patients treated with inhaled therapy alone. This post-hoc analysis of the CAPTAIN Trial evaluated patients’ ability to achieve CR on FF/VI and FF/UMEC/VI. Methods: CAPTAIN, a phase IIIa RCT, investigated once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI in patients ≥18 years with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma despite maintenance ICS/LABA. CR was defined as no systemic corticosteroid use, no severe exacerbations, ACQ-5 total score <1.5, and change from baseline in trough FEV₁ ≥100mL. CR was assessed at Weeks 24 and 52 for FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 or 200/62.5/25mcg versus FF/VI 100/25 or 200/25mcg. Odds/risk ratios (OR/RR; 95% CIs) were calculated for Week 24 data. Missing data/study withdrawals/lost-to-follow-up were considered non-responders. Results: At Week 24, 31%(127/406) and 36%(146/408) of patients receiving FF/UMEC/VI 100 or 200 achieved CR versus 19%(77/407) and 26%(104/406) receiving FF/VI 100 or 200; similar achievements were seen for patients with data at Week 52 (FF/UMEC/VI 100: 30%[27/91]; 200: 38%[35/91]; FF/VI 100: 21%[18/87]; 200: 24%[22/91]). Patients receiving FF/UMEC/VI 100 were more likely to achieve CR at Week 24 than those receiving FF/VI 100 (OR: 1.93[1.39, 2.68], p<0.001; RR: 1.65[1.29, 2.12], p<0.001), as was seen for FF/UMEC/VI 200 versus FF/VI 200 (OR: 1.62[1.19, 2.19], p=0.002; RR: 1.40[1.13, 1.72], p=0.002). All p-values are nominally statistically significant. Discussion: A greater proportion of patients with FF/UMEC/VI demonstrated CR than FF/VI. CR is a feasible treatment goal for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma receiving FF/UMEC/VI and FF/VI. Funding: GSK (205715; NCT02924688)

Resource information

Respiratory conditions
  • Asthma
Respiratory topics
  • Inhalers
Type of resource
Abstract
Conference
Brasov 2025
Author(s)
Njira Lugogo 1, John Oppenheimer 2, Jodie Crawford 3, Tom Corbridge 4, Peter Howarth 5, Emmeline Burrows 4, Alison Moore 5, Stephen G Noorduyn 6,7, David Slade 8, Stephen Weng 9, Ian Pavord 10 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States 2 Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, United States 3 Development Biostatistics, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom 4 US Medical Affairs, GSK, Durham, United States 5 Global Medical Affairs, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom 6 Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Mississauga, Canada 7 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 8 US Medical Affairs, GSK, Collegeville, United States 9 Respiratory Biostatistics, GSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom 10 Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, Oxford, United Kingdom and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom